The Cryptonomics™
  • Home
  • Blockchain
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • NFTS
  • Altcoin
  • Mining
  • Consulting
Reading: segregated witness – Why doesn’t my Taproot transaction builder (buildTaprootTx utilizing @cmdcode/tapscript) work as anticipated?
Share
Please enter CoinGecko Free Api Key to get this plugin works.
The Cryptonomics™The Cryptonomics™
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
  • Blockchain
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • NFTS
  • Altcoin
  • Mining
  • Consulting
Follow US
  • About Us
  • Advertising Solutions
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
Copyright © MetaMedia™ Capital Inc, All right reserved
The Cryptonomics™ > Bitcoin > segregated witness – Why doesn’t my Taproot transaction builder (buildTaprootTx utilizing @cmdcode/tapscript) work as anticipated?
Bitcoin

segregated witness – Why doesn’t my Taproot transaction builder (buildTaprootTx utilizing @cmdcode/tapscript) work as anticipated?

admin
Last updated: August 6, 2025 9:11 pm
admin Published August 6, 2025
Share
segregated witness – Why doesn’t my Taproot transaction builder (buildTaprootTx utilizing @cmdcode/tapscript) work as anticipated?


I wrote the next operate to construct and signal Taproot (P2TR) transactions utilizing @cmdcode/tapscript. My intention is to assist each key-path and script-path spends, and optionally each collectively.

The issue is that it doesn’t work as anticipated:

Script-path spends typically fail to validate (e.g., management block errors, invalid witness, or failed script execution).

Can somebody overview my code and level out what’s flawed with my logic or implementation?
I’d particularly respect recommendation on tips on how to repair script-path failures and any efficiency enhancements for the key-path case.

import { Deal with, Signer, Faucet, Tx } from '@cmdcode/tapscript';

protected buildTaprootTx(
  senderKey: { publicKey: Uint8Array; privateKey: Uint8Array },
  utxos: Array<{ txid: string; vout: quantity; worth: quantity }>,
  recipient: string,
  amountSat: quantity,
  feeSat: quantity,
  mode: 'key' | 'script' | 'each',
  scriptLeaves: Array = [],
  opReturnData?: Uint8Array | string,
  changeAddr?: string
): string {
  // ... (full code as in my gist, see hyperlink under)
}

full code

Questions:

  • What am I doing flawed, particularly concerning script-path spending?

  • Is there a greater method to construction or optimize the operate for
    efficiency and correctness?

  • In the event you spot any apparent bugs or misunderstandings in how I take advantage of
    Taproot key/script path logic, please level them out.

Any code overview, ideas, or working instance references are extremely appreciated. Thanks!



Supply hyperlink

You Might Also Like

EU banks should maintain 12.5x capital towards BTC beneath new guidelines

XTER is obtainable for buying and selling!

Trump Govt Order To Probe Debanking Of Crypto Companies: WSJ

‘Suboptimal Capital Leakage’ in GCC As a consequence of Lack of Crypto ETPs, Warns Defi Tech President

Brazil Units August Listening to for Nationwide Bitcoin Reserve

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Ethereum’s evolution threatens Bitcoin’s high retailer of worth place Ethereum’s evolution threatens Bitcoin’s high retailer of worth place
Next Article Roman Storm might be Retried for Cash Laundering and Sanctions — Attorneys Roman Storm might be Retried for Cash Laundering and Sanctions — Attorneys
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to our newslettern

Get Newest Articles Instantly!

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Popular News
Ethereum’s evolution threatens Bitcoin’s high retailer of worth place
Bitcoin loses key help at $115,800 as altcoin merchants capitulate, signaling fading threat urge for food
The journey to a mature asset administration system
The journey to a mature asset administration system
High 3 Meme Coin Gems Price Shopping for Earlier than Could 2024 – PEPE, WIF, and DOGEVERSE
High 3 Meme Coin Gems Price Shopping for Earlier than Could 2024 – PEPE, WIF, and DOGEVERSE

Follow Us on Socials

We use social media to react to breaking news, update supporters and share information

Facebook Instagram Linkedin Pinterest Tiktok Twitter Youtube
The Cryptonomics™

Cryptonomics Magazine is your premier digital source for blockchain insights, offering cutting-edge research, news, interviews, and ICO updates for everyone from entrepreneurs to institutions. We drive blockchain knowledge and growth.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Always Stay Up to Date

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Bitcoin loses key help at $115,800 as altcoin merchants capitulate, signaling fading threat urge for food
August 7, 2025
Ethereum Cannot Break $4K? ETH Value Discovery is Shut, Says Analyst
August 7, 2025
US Bitcoin miners face 21% rig price surge after Trump’s tariff goes reside
August 7, 2025
Solana (SOL) Poised for Transfer – Can It Clear This Barrier?
August 7, 2025
BTCFi VC Funding hits $175M in H1 2025, Traders refocus on Client Apps
August 7, 2025
Copyright © The Cryptonomics™ , All right reserved
  • About Us
  • Advertising Solutions
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
Join Us!

Subscribe & Stay Ahead of the Curve with Cryptonomics !

Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?